OPEN LETTER TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

It has four parts:

1.Two Letters to Justice Samuel Alito. HERE and HERE

2.Open Letter to the Supreme Court. HERE

3.Attachment A: Summary of Constitutional Violations Committed by the New Jersey Judiciary and agency (Board of Trustees, TPAF). HERE

4.Attachment B: Irregularities at the Supreme Court Which Add to My Suspicion of Foul Play in My Case. HERE

MY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE US SUPREME COURT CAN BE READ AT THE LINK BELOW:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-339/283897/20231002102111023_20231002-101906-95760700-00004170.pdf

THIS IS HOW MY PETITION’S INTRODUCTION BEGINS:

The Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution are meant to protect the constitutional rights of the citizens of this nation and to ensure that they are not deprived by their state governments of life, liberty or property without the due process of the law.
But what happens when a state government unjustly deprives its citizens of those rights and of their livelihood with the complicity of the very institution
that is supposed to prevent it?
In such a case, will this Court intervene on behalf of the individuals being harmed and on behalf of the Constitution and the rule of law?
This is the main question before this Court.

HERE ARE THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE SUPREME COURT:

  1. Whether ALJs violate the rule of law by depriving petitioners of their disability pensions on credibility grounds when petitioners have met their burden of proof and the questioning of their credibility is based on an ALJ’s unexplained “impression” and on a state expert’s opinion not based on medical facts.
  2. Whether State Appellate and Supreme Courts respectively deny petitioners due process of the law when:
    a. Affirming an ALJ’s Decision by making false statements prejudicial to petitioner and by failing to address petitioner’s Brief’s legal points showing that the ALJ’s Decision wasn’t based on cogent reasons.
    b. Ignoring a petitioner’s request to investigate a likely collusion between the Appellate Court and the agency in an ongoing appeal and later
    denying review of said court’s decision.
  3. Whether state courts violate the First Amendment when sealing records on the grounds that petitioner’s privacy needs to be protected even though such privacy does not overcome the strong presumption of public access to records and even though petitioner wants the record unsealed in order to share it with the public.


ONE NATION UNDER GOD WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

Could New Jerseyans be living under the illusion of freedom when in fact they are living under tyranny?

Could “honorable” members of the judiciary, including Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, be part of this tyranny?

Could the media be complicit by ignoring a citizen’s request to investigate and expose the government’s wrongdoings?

I realize this sounds like some type of crazy conspiracy theory. But the question is:

Is it happening? Who is watching the watchers?

+ PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION +